ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparative analysis of printed electronics technologies in RF and microwave circuits.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Printed electronics (PE) present a promising alternative to conventional photolithography by enabling rapid prototyping with reduced costs, material waste, and enhanced design flexibility and advantages, particularly relevant for high-frequency microwave applications. This study presents the design, fabrication, and evaluation of two microstrip low-pass filters (LPFs) with cutoff frequencies of 2.60 GHz and 3.55 GHz serving as representative components for microwave circuits, using three additive manufacturing techniques: Direct-Write (DW), Screen Printing (SP), and Aerosol Jet Printing (AJP). Over 60 filter samples were fabricated and measured to systematically assess performance across different printing methods. The LPFs were designed and analyzed through electromagnetic simulations, complemented by an LC equivalent circuit model based on actual device dimensions to better understand their behavior. Measured frequency responses showed strong agreement with simulations, validating the effectiveness of all three printing methods. Each technique demonstrated unique trade-offs between resolution, fabrication complexity, and electrical performance, emphasizing the need to tailor method selection to specific application requirements. This paper offers valuable insights into the design, analysis, and fabrication of RF and microwave circuits using printed electronics, highlighting the strengths and limitations of each technique. It serves as a practical guide for researchers in selecting suitable methods for high-frequency applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.