ArticleScientific reports2025
Transversely isotropic hyperelastic laws for 2D FEM modeling of human thoracic spine ligaments.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A comparative analysis of three transversely isotropic hyperelastic constitutive laws is presented to characterize the mechanical behavior of spinal ligaments within finite element simulations. In each material model, the total strain energy is partitioned into ground‑matrix and fiber contributions. The ground‑matrix response was represented by three strain‑energy functions, Neo‑Hookean, Mooney‑Rivlin, and Yeoh, whereas the fiber response was captured by a fourth‑order polynomial. Constitutive parameters were calibrated against experimental uniaxial tension data from human thoracic spinal ligaments. The models were implemented via user‑defined material subroutines in Abaqus and LS‑Dyna and evaluated with finite shell elements. Performance of the afore-mentioned constitutive laws was assessed based on their ability to fit experimental data and their computational efficiency. The results indicate that, although the Yeoh model provides the best fit to the experimental data in terms of root mean square error, it tends to underestimate the fiber contribution to the overall material response, resulting in an over-stiffening effect in simulations of short-sample tensile tests. In contrast, the Neo-Hookean and Mooney-Rivlin models do not exhibit this issue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.