ArticleScientific reports2025
Minimal clinical predictors enable machine learning detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in a Filipino cohort.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite significant advancements in the diagnosis and treatment of Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the overall prognosis remains challenging due to its multifactorial nature. Recently, machine learning has been increasingly utilized in HCC-related research, offering significant advancements in diagnostic accuracy and early detection. However, the application of these techniques in diverse populations, particularly underrepresented groups, remains limited. In this study, seven machine learning algorithms: logistic regression (LR), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), support vector classifier (SVC), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), stochastic gradient boosting (GB) and LightGBM, were tested. Optimal hyperparameters were determined using a grid-search approach, and several feature selection techniques were applied to identify key predictors in detecting HCC. Among the tested algorithms, the RF, with its optimal hyperparameters, demonstrated superior predictive performance at 98.9 % accuracy, 90.5% sensitivity, 99.8% specificity, 99% NPV, 98% PPV, and an AUC of 0.99. LightGBM delivered similarly strong results, attaining an AUC of 0.99, 99.1% accuracy, 94.9% sensitivity, 99.5% specificity, 99.5% NPV, and 95.5% PPV. Notably, only seven clinical predictors: age, albumin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin (DCP), aspartate transaminase, and platelet count, were necessary to achieve these results. In addition, we illustrate that RF has a robust capability to detect HCC irrespective of the clinical risk factors. This study underscores the potential of machine-learning-based detection models as an alternative for HCC detection and screening. The use of a limited set of predictors not only simplifies the diagnostic process but is also advantageous for resource-limited and remote settings. Using machine learning in HCC detection can significantly improve diagnostic efficiency and enable earlier detection, potentially leading to better patient outcomes and more effective treatment strategies. This research is the first comprehensive analysis of HCC clinical data from a Filipino cohort, offering critical insights into the disease within an underrepresented group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.