ArticleScientific reports2025
Hemodynamics of active abdominal compression decompression CPR in a rat model of multiple rib fractures with asphyxial cardiac arrest.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Neuroprotective Mechanisms of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Cerebral Ischemia-Hypoxia Injury Following Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation.International journal of medical sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Active abdominal compression-decompression resuscitation (AACD-CPR) has been proposed as an alternative to standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation (STD-CPR) for cases of multiple rib fractures with asphyxial cardiac arrest (CA), yet its underlying hemodynamic effects remain unclear. In this study, thirty-eight rats underwent bilateral rib fracture modeling, with thirty successfully modeled and then randomly assigned to the AACD-CPR, STD-CPR, or sham groups (n = 10 each). After surgical procedures, rats experienced 8 min of asphyxia followed by assigned CPR, or no intervention in the sham group. Hemodynamic and arterial blood gas parameters were measured at multiple time points during and after resuscitation, and rates of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) as well as cumulative 240-minute survival were recorded. AACD-CPR resulted in lower right atrial diastolic pressure during resuscitation and less severe acidosis at 30 min post-resuscitation compared to STD-CPR, although other hemodynamic and outcome measures did not differ significantly between the two resuscitation techniques. These findings suggest that AACD-CPR can achieve similar hemodynamic performance and survival outcomes to STD-CPR in a rat model of multiple rib fractures causing asphyxial cardiac arrest, supporting its potential as an alternative when conventional chest compressions are compromised.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.