ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning models using dual-phase CT radiomics for early detection of PRISm.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Preserved Ratio Impaired Spirometry (PRISm) is considered an early stage of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which may either revert to normal or progress to COPD. Therefore, early identification is crucial for improving patient prognosis. In this study, we developed multiple machine learning (ML) models based on inspiratory and/or expiratory breath-hold chest computed tomography (CT) images to identify PRISm. A total of 270 subjects were prospectively enrolled, and clinical models, radiomics models, and combined clinical-radiomics models were constructed using inspiratory, expiratory, and dual-phase CT images, respectively. The results demonstrated that combined models outperformed clinical models alone across all three phases. Among them, the logistic regression (LR)-based combined models using expiratory or dual-phase CT achieved the best performance, with comparable area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values and superior performance to the inspiratory-phase models. Specifically, the AUCs (95% confidence intervals [CI]) of the clinical model in the training, internal, and external validation sets were 0.825 (0.750-0.900), 0.771 (0.639-0.903), and 0.778 (0.653-0.904), respectively. For the expiratory-phase combined model, the AUCs were 0.901 (0.845-0.956), 0.819 (0.680-0.957), and 0.817 (0.695-0.940), while for the dual-phase combined model, they were 0.901 (0.846-0.955), 0.821 (0.684-0.957), and 0.813 (0.694-0.932), indicating that adding inspiratory data did not significantly improve model performance. Based on these findings, we recommend that single-phase expiratory CT scans, combined with clinical features and analyzed using LR models, be prioritized in clinical practice for efficient PRISm identification, providing support for early diagnosis and timely intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.