ArticleScientific data2025
A large expert-annotated single-cell peripheral blood dataset for hematological disease diagnostics.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Illusion of competence: vision-language models provide confident but inaccurate explanations in cytological diagnostics.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Distinguishing cell types in a peripheral blood smear is critical for diagnosing blood diseases, such as leukemia subtypes. Artificial intelligence can assist in automating cell classification. For training robust machine learning algorithms, however, large and well-annotated single-cell datasets are pivotal. Here, we introduce a large, publicly available, annotated peripheral blood dataset comprising >40,000 single-cell images classified into 18 classes by cytomorphology experts from the Munich Leukemia Laboratory, the largest European laboratory for blood disease diagnostics. By making our dataset publicly available, we provide a valuable resource for medical and machine learning researchers and support the development of reliable and clinically relevant diagnostic tools for diagnosing hematological diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.