Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41219195›Full record

ReviewNature communications2025

Learning from nature: phytochemical strategies to protect against UV-B damage.

Mustafa Bulut, Takayuki Tohge, Wei Chen, Jie Luo, Zhirong Wang, Xu Huang, Meiliang Zhou, Alisdair R Fernie

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Phytochemical Profile and Biological Activities ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mustafa BulutProgram Center MetaCom, Leibniz Institute of Plant Biochemistry, Halle (Saale), Germany. mustafa.bulut@ipb-halle.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6038-518X
Takayuki TohgeGraduate School of Biological Science, Nara Institute of Science and Technology (NAIST), Ikoma, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5555-5650
Wei ChenNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement and National Center of Plant Gene Research (Wuhan), Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Jie LuoSchool of Breeding and Multiplication (Sanya Institute of Breeding and Multiplication), Hainan University, Sanya, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4931-7469
Zhirong WangNational Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement / Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Xu HuangNational Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement / Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.
Meiliang ZhouNational Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement / Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China. zhoumeiliang@caas.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5175-3684
Alisdair R FernieMax-Planck-Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Potsdam, Germany. fernie@mpimp-golm.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9000-335X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The colonization of terrestrial ecosystems exposed plants to intensified solar radiation, particularly that of UV-B (280-315 nm), which induces DNA, RNA and protein damage. While historical ozone depletion exacerbated UV-B stress, recent stabilization efforts have mitigated its effects. However, independent fluctuations in UV-B levels continue to challenge crop performance, particularly in equatorial regions. Plants have evolved diverse UV-B-protective strategies, including producing specialized metabolites such as flavonoids, phenylpropanoids and ascorbate alongside lineage-specific compounds like mycosporine-like amino acids. These metabolites act as antioxidants, UV-B absorbers and stress mitigators, with their diversity driven by gene duplication and environmental adaptation. In keeping with this, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified key genetic loci, such as OsUVR8 and OsMYB44, regulating UV-B tolerance through enhanced flavonol glycoside and tryptamine derivatives biosynthesis. These combined data suggest that we should be able to fortify plants' tolerance to UV-B by future breeding strategies. Advances in spatially resolved metabolomics and machine learning hold promise for identifying novel UV-B-protective compounds and facilitating precise metabolic engineering. In addition, modifications to cell wall composition, including lignin thickening and embedding UV-B-absorbing phenylpropanoids, offer another venue for protective mechanisms. Recent discoveries of natural variation in UV-B protectants across species like rice, barley and maize highlight the potential for breeding UV-resilient crops. Such innovations will not only bolster UV-B tolerance but also enhance crop nutritional value, as many UV-B-protective compounds also serve as essential nutrients as well as harbor antioxidant properties. This comprehensive understanding of UV-B responses, from molecular signaling to phytochemical strategies and structural adaptations, underscores the potential for leveraging genetic engineering and natural variation to mitigate UV-B-induced stress.

Indexed as

PhytochemicalsPlantsUltraviolet RaysAntioxidantsFlavonoidsGenome-Wide Association StudyMetabolomicsAntioxidantsFlavonoidsPhytochemicals

Identifiers

PMID41219195
PMCPMC12606349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.