ReviewMicrosystems & nanoengineering2025
Recent advances in spike-based neural coding for tactile perception.
Review in Microsystems & nanoengineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neuromorphic Technologies for Neuroengineering: From Adaptive Stimulation to SNN-Based Inference and Deployable Biointerfaces.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Electromechanical Connectome: Integrating Voltage, Mechanical Nano-Forces, and Subcellular Fluid Phase Dynamics in Human Neural Computation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Decodability, sensitivity, and criticality measured through single-neuron perturbations.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tactile perception in artificial systems remains constrained by the von Neumann architecture, where the separation of memory and computation leads to significant latency and energy inefficiency. Neuromorphic engineering provides a biologically inspired alternative by adopting event-driven, spike-based coding, akin to neural signaling in human somatosensory systems. This review systematically examines spike-based neural coding techniques for tactile perception, focusing on three key aspects: encoding strategies, neuromorphic hardware implementations, and decoding methodologies. It compares rate coding and temporal coding in terms of biological plausibility and computational efficiency, particularly in dynamic and high-speed tactile tasks. A range of hardware platforms is evaluated, including oscillator-based encoding circuits, CMOS and memristor-based spiking neurons, and self-powered tactile sensors using triboelectric nanogenerators. On the decoding side, mechanisms such as spike-timing-dependent plasticity and spiking neural networks are analyzed for their potential to support adaptive, online learning in tactile systems. The review emphasizes co-design approaches that integrate sensing, encoding, and processing within a unified framework to achieve system-level efficiency. By bridging advances in functional materials, low-power hardware, and brain-inspired computation, this work outlines a roadmap toward artificial tactile systems with millisecond-level latency, sub-milliwatt power consumption, and high perceptual fidelity. These capabilities are essential for future applications in robotics, prosthetics, and wearable electronics.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.