ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2026
Medial Frontal Theta Reduction Impairs Rule Switching via Prediction Error.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impaired midfrontal‑motor theta phase synchronization characterizes maladaptive motivational behavior in people with obsessive‑compulsive disorder.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Cerebellar Time and Relative Time: A Comparator-Based Dynamical Timing Model and its Relevance to Psychopathology and Therapies.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cognitive flexibility, the ability to switch behavior in response to changing rules in an uncertain environment, is crucial for adaptive decision-making. Prior research has hypothesized a key role of prediction error and theta oscillations in the medial frontal cortex in this process. However, the causal link between such processes remains to be established. To address this, we combined neural stimulation, EEG, behavioral measurement, and computational modeling. Specifically, we applied high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation to modulate theta oscillations as measured via EEG followed by a probabilistic reversal learning task in 48 adults (18 female and 30 male human subjects). We found that anodal stimulation reduced theta power and rule prediction error, and it increased the number of trials needed to reliably switch between rules. These findings support the role of rule prediction error signaling as a key mechanism linking neural oscillations to behavioral adaptation and highlight the importance of theta power and rule prediction error for cognitive flexibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.