Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41219132›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2026

Medial Frontal Theta Reduction Impairs Rule Switching via Prediction Error.

Yifei Zhang, Feng Deng, Jiajun Liao, Tom Verguts, Qi Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yifei ZhangSchool of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China.
Feng DengSchool of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.
Jiajun LiaoSchool of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.
Tom VergutsDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent B9000, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7783-4754
Qi ChenSchool of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China chenqi@szu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive flexibility, the ability to switch behavior in response to changing rules in an uncertain environment, is crucial for adaptive decision-making. Prior research has hypothesized a key role of prediction error and theta oscillations in the medial frontal cortex in this process. However, the causal link between such processes remains to be established. To address this, we combined neural stimulation, EEG, behavioral measurement, and computational modeling. Specifically, we applied high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation to modulate theta oscillations as measured via EEG followed by a probabilistic reversal learning task in 48 adults (18 female and 30 male human subjects). We found that anodal stimulation reduced theta power and rule prediction error, and it increased the number of trials needed to reliably switch between rules. These findings support the role of rule prediction error signaling as a key mechanism linking neural oscillations to behavioral adaptation and highlight the importance of theta power and rule prediction error for cognitive flexibility.

Indexed as

Frontal LobeReversal LearningTheta RhythmAdolescentAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleTranscranial Direct Current StimulationYoung Adultcognitive flexibilityHD-tDCSmedial frontal cortex (MFC)prediction errorrule switchingtheta oscillations

Identifiers

PMID41219132
PMCPMC12782750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.