Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41219065›Full record

ArticleRisk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis2025

Globally Critical Infrastructure: The Unique Risks and Challenges.

Zachary Kallenborn, Henry H Willis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Reviewing a Theory Life Cycle in Disaster Management.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Globally Critical Infrastructure: The Unique Risks and Challenges.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zachary KallenbornDepartment of War Studies, King's College London, London, UK.
Henry H WillisRAND Center on AI, Security, and Technology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Critical infrastructure is typically identified at the national level. However, disruption to certain infrastructure systems, facilities, and assets can have negative consequences for global societies. Such globally critical infrastructure entails a distinct risk profile for both countries dependent on the infrastructure, and countries that have such infrastructure in their territory. The goal of the article is to provide an initial framing and definition of "globally critical infrastructure" as a concept worthy of attention and explore the unique risk analysis and management challenges to support future, more rigorous examinations. For dependent countries, globally critical infrastructure exists outside of their border (or possibly outside any country's border), under sometimes drastically different economic, political, governance, and threat environments. Risk management entails unique challenges, because countries dependent on that infrastructure may have no legal or regulatory authority to shape risk management practices at facilities in other countries. Consequently, risk management may extend beyond the domains of the typical homeland or internal affairs agencies to include capabilities and responsibilities of ministries of foreign affairs, trade and commerce, and defense. However, those challenges also imply new risk management demands and options, such as new avenues for international cooperation on infrastructure protection and resilience, international funding, and enhanced monitoring. Having a globally critical infrastructure system in its borders changes the risk dynamics for a nation state, creating potential leverage over dependent nations and new avenues to garner international support, but also creates new risks to national sovereignty. Recognizing these common dependencies can better enable the global community to engage stakeholders to develop and implement systemic risk management approaches worldwide.

Indexed as

critical infrastructureglobal infrastructurerisk analysisrisk management

Identifiers

PMID41219065
PMCPMC12747701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.