ArticleBJGP open2025
Artificial intelligence in general practice in Germany: an online survey of current use, perceived benefits, barriers, and future needs.
Article in BJGP open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Use of AI scribes in UK primary care: a survey of general practitioners.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly recognised as a transformative tool in health care. However, despite these prospects, the adoption of AI in primary care remains limited in Germany owing to various concerns.
aimTo investigate current AI use, perceived barriers, and training needs among GPs. It also aims to compare attitudes of current users and non-users of AI technologies. DESIGN &
settingThis was a cross-sectional study of practising GPs in the Free State of Saxony, Germany; participants received an invitation to participate in an online survey between November 2024 and January 2025.
methodIn total, 1620 GPs received an invitation and two additional reminders to complete the survey via REDCap.
resultsA total of 154 GPs completed the questionnaire, of whom
conclusionOur study underscores the need for targeted training programmes that address GPs' specific needs and concerns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.