Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41218961›Full record

ArticleBMJ case reports2025

Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation in a patient with residual chronic type A aortic dissection.

Adeogo Akinwale Olusan, Monica Rajendran, Madiha Iqbal, Shazia Hussain, Amerjeet Banning, Raj Rajendra, Elved Bryn Roberts, Jan Kovac

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Adeogo Akinwale OlusanCardiology, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK aakinwale@yahoo.co.uk.
Monica RajendranCardiology, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Madiha IqbalCardiology, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Shazia HussainCardiology, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Amerjeet BanningCardiology, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Raj RajendraCardiology, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Elved Bryn RobertsCardiology, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.
Jan KovacCardiology, Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a viable treatment of choice in patients with severe aortic stenosis across a wide spectrum of surgical risks (inoperable-high-moderate-low risk). Valve-in-valve (ViV) TAVI has emerged as a valid treatment option in patients with failed aortic bioprosthetic valves, especially in those with intermediate, high or prohibitive risk of surgery.ViV TAVI in patients with prior surgical bioprosthesis presents significant challenges, particularly in cases with stentless valves or radiolucent posts. Therefore, adequate pre-procedural planning is of utmost importance to its success. However, our case had multiple challenges that had to be overcome, including radiolucent posts, residual chronic type A aortic dissection flap in the non-coronary cusp and large body habitus with Killip class IV. Having successfully navigated the above challenges, we report this interesting and complex case of ViV TAVI which was a procedural success associated with significant improvement and recovery.

Indexed as

Aortic DissectionAortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisHeart Valve ProsthesisTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementAgedAged, 80 and overBioprosthesisChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleTreatment OutcomeClinical diagnostic testsHeart failureInterventional cardiologyRadiology (diagnostics)Valvar diseases

Identifiers

PMID41218961
PMCPMC12612571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.