ArticleFamily medicine and community health2025
'In Texas, everybody wants antibiotics': reducing inappropriate antibiotic expectations and use with a provider-patient communication tool in primary care.
Article in Family medicine and community health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivePatients often expect antibiotics for self-limiting diseases, pressuring providers to prescribe antibiotics unnecessarily. These expectations also contribute to the unsafe practice of taking antibiotics without a prescription (non-prescription use), such as pills retained from prior prescriptions or antibiotics from non-medical sources. Previous work shows that non-prescription use is due to strong, widely held misconceptions regarding the curative power of antibiotics. To reduce unnecessary use of antibiotics, we developed and pilot-tested a patient-focused, bilingual (English and Spanish) educational tool with patient and provider stakeholder input. The tool, a trifold brochure, included information on safe antibiotic use, potential antibiotic harms and symptom management with over-the-counter medications.
designUsing a qualitative design, we conducted a two-phase study to (1) develop a provider-patient communication tool and (2) pilot-test the tool in primary care clinics. Development of the tool involved patient advisory board meetings and healthcare professional (HCP) focus groups. Pilot-testing of the tool was done through semistructured interviews of randomly recruited patients from primary clinic waiting rooms and their providers.
settingPublicly funded safety net primary care clinics in Texas.
participantsPatients (n=18) and HCPs (nurses, medical assistants, pharmacists, nurse practitioners and physicians) (n=14) from participating clinics.
resultThemes were extracted from the qualitative data. Main themes from the development phase highlighted the need to create a simple tool to make it clear that antibiotics are not used to treat viral infections, pain or allergies and that using antibiotics without consulting a medical professional is not safe. During pilot-testing, providers noted the tool helped adjust patients' antibiotic expectations. Providers felt that the tool gave them credibility in scenarios where antibiotics were not indicated. Patients felt that the tool provided alternatives to antibiotics for symptom relief. Patients and providers found the tool useful in supporting patient-provider communication around antibiotic use.
conclusionsA stakeholder-driven, patient-focused educational tool addressing inappropriate antibiotic use facilitated patient-provider communication around antibiotic usage and helped manage patients' antibiotic expectations. Embedding this tool into a community-facing intervention may reduce use of antibiotics without a prescription.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.