Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41218758›Full record

ArticleBiology letters2025

Monk parakeets 'test the waters' when forming new relationships.

Claire L O'Connell, Gerald G Carter, Annemarie van der Marel, Elizabeth A Hobson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Claire L O'ConnellDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3852-3021
Gerald G CarterDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6933-5501
Annemarie van der MarelDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Elizabeth A HobsonDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1523-6967

Funding

National Science Foundation 2015928National Science Foundation 2015932National Science Foundation CAREER 2239099University of Cincinnati University of Cincinnati's University Research Council Faculty Scholars Research Award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Initiating and developing social relationships with strangers can provide fitness benefits, but it is an inherently risky process. To mitigate potential risks and develop trust, strangers may 'test the waters' by gradually escalating the type of social investment from low-cost to high-cost. Opportunities to capture the moment animals first encounter one another in the wild are rare, and detailed quantitative assessments of when and how animals initiate relationships are limited. We introduced four unfamiliar groups of feral monk parakeets together into a single 22-bird group and observed the sequence of social behaviours that occurred as relationships developed over 22 days. We tested the effect of relationship status (stranger versus familiar) on the probability of dyads following predicted sequences and whether strangers who progressed their relationships maintained higher rates of no-contact proximity compared with dyads that did not. We found that stranger dyads, but not familiar dyads, were more likely to (i) approach each other without contact before making contact and (ii) follow predicted sequences of affiliative behaviours. Strangers that progressed to contact also had higher rates of associations than did birds that never made contact. These findings provide support for 'Testing the Waters' during new relationship formation in a socially and cognitively complex species.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalSocial BehaviorAnimalsFemaleMaleaffiliative relationshipsanimal socialitypair bondingparrotsocial dynamics

Identifiers

PMID41218758
PMCPMC12606181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.