ArticleBrain research2026
Testing an increasing social working memory load in the female rat.
Article in Brain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Across animal taxa, the ability to recognize members of one's species individually is a critical form of memory, mediating social interactions necessary for individual and species survival. A variety of laboratory behavioral tasks quantify conspecific social memory ability based on the premise of novelty exploration, in which the time spent exploring a novel, never-met conspecific is greater than the time spent exploring a familiar, previously-met animal. Here, we present a novel behavioral protocol that was designed for the systematic evaluation of social memory with an increasing memory load in the rat. This protocol considers and builds upon currently used behavioral tasks quantifying social memory between a load of two animals: one novel and one familiar. Two versions of the protocol were compared, one in which increases in memory load were progressive across trials (Progressive), and one in which the load challenge of each trial was semi-randomized (Nonprogressive). We found that young, gonadally-intact female rats demonstrated social memory of numerous conspecifics simultaneously. Specifically, rats could differentiate a novel conspecific from one, two, or three familiar conspecifics. At higher social working memory demands, in which there were more animals to remember and differentiate, social discrimination ability was absent. Additionally, the Progressive and Nonprogressive load conditions did not yield different patterns in social memory abilities. This social memory load task provides a relevant tool for the experimental evaluation of social memory in female rats, a memory type that is clinically relevant, conserved, and distinct from other memory types in neurobiological and neuroendocrine mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.