Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41218378›Full record

ArticleAnais brasileiros de dermatologia

Highlights of the Brazilian Society of Dermatology's Brazilian Consensus on Psoriasis.

Ricardo Romiti, André V E de Carvalho, Juliana Nakano, Gleison V Duarte, Grupo de Trabalho do Consenso Brasileiro de Psoríase da Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Anais brasileiros de dermatologia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ricardo RomitiDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
André V E de CarvalhoHospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Juliana NakanoDermatology Clinic, Santa Casa de Misericórdia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Gleison V DuarteInstituto Bahiano de Imunoterapia, Salvador, BA, Brazil. Electronic address: gleison.duarte@clinicaibis.com.br.
Grupo de Trabalho do Consenso Brasileiro de Psoríase da Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2024 Brazilian Consensus on Psoriasis and Treatment Algorithm of the Brazilian Society of Dermatology (SBD, Sociedade Brasileira de Dermatologia) comes four years after the release of the last Consensus, published in 2020. This new consensus now includes 43 chapters and has the participation of 85 professionals from across Brazil, including dermatologists and rheumatologists working in university hospitals, research centers, and public and private healthcare systems. The concept of Cumulative Life Course Impairment (CLCI), the inclusion of new biologics approved in Brazil after 2020, the update on psoriasis treatment in specific situations (such as pregnancy and surgery), and the discussion on "Response Predictors" are examples of updates addressed in this Consensus. The updated treatment algorithm used experts' responses through the Delphi method and, among other modifications, removed acitretin from the plaque psoriasis treatment sequence, defined treatment lines for choosing immunobiologicals in both adult and pediatric populations, and included spesolimab and cyclosporine as first-line treatments for generalized pustular psoriasis. Finally, the new Consensus addresses the place of small molecule inhibitors in the algorithm and discusses future treatment options for plaque psoriasis.

Indexed as

PsoriasisAlgorithmsBrazilDermatologic AgentsDermatologyHumansSocieties, MedicalDermatologic AgentsAlgorithmsConsensusPsoriasis

Identifiers

PMID41218378
PMCPMC12650776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.