Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41218123›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

General laws of biodiversity: Climatic niches predict plant range size and ecological dominance globally.

Gabriel M Moulatlet, Cory Merow, Brian Maitner, Brad Boyle, Xiao Feng, Amy E Frazier, Cesar Hinojo-Hinojo, Erica A Newman, Patrick R Roehrdanz, Lei Song and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. General laws of biodiversity: Climatic niches predict plant range size and ecological dominance globally.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Gabriel M MoulatletDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85719.ORCID 0000-0003-2571-1207
Cory MerowEversource Energy Center and Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269.ORCID 0000-0003-0561-053X
Brian MaitnerDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of South Florida, St. Petersburg, FL 33620.ORCID 0000-0002-2118-9880
Brad BoyleDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85719.ORCID 0000-0002-9934-6655
Xiao FengDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.ORCID 0000-0003-4638-3927
Amy E FrazierDepartment of Geography, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106.ORCID 0000-0003-4552-4935
Cesar Hinojo-HinojoDepartamento de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas, Universidad de Sonora, Hermosillo 83000, Sonora, México.
Erica A NewmanDepartment of Biology, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA 22801.ORCID 0000-0001-6433-8594
Patrick R RoehrdanzMoore Center for Science, Conservation International, Arlington, VA 22202.ORCID 0000-0003-4047-5011
Lei SongDepartment of Geography, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106.
Fabricio VillalobosRed de Biología Evolutiva, Instituto de Ecología A.C., Xalapa, Veracruz, México 91073.ORCID 0000-0002-5230-2217
Pablo A MarquetFacultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8331150, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-6369-9339
Jens-Christian SvenningCenter for Ecological Dynamics in a Novel Biosphere, Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Aarhus C 8000, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3415-0862
Brian J EnquistDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85719.ORCID 0000-0002-6124-7096

Funding

DOE | Office of Science (SC) DEAC02- 05CH11231National Science Foundation (NSF) 2225076National Science Foundation (NSF) 2225078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A longstanding question in ecology asks whether or not species that achieve large geographic ranges also have large climatic niche breadths. Using a dataset of ~250,000 terrestrial plant species spanning diverse clades (bryophytes, ferns, gymnosperms, and flowering plants), we demonstrate a consistent positive relationship between geographic range size and climatic niche breadth across latitudinal and elevational gradients. This relationship holds across major phylogenetic groups, suggesting a general biogeographical rule for range size variation. Our findings indicate that latitudinal and elevational gradients in range size arise from selective pressures and species sorting based on climatic tolerance. Additionally, we show that species with larger range sizes tend to be ecologically dominant, supporting a long-suspected connection between range size, niche breadth, and local and regional abundance. Our results suggest a spectrum of dominance, where species with extensive geographic ranges and broader climatic tolerances tend to be more abundant. We posit that the relationship between range size, niche breadth, and ecological dominance is an emergent macroecological pattern that can be used for understanding and predicting the impacts of climate change on species distributions.

Indexed as

BiodiversityClimateEcosystemPlantsClimate ChangeGeographyPhylogenylatitudinal gradientmacroecologyniche breadthspecies abundancesspecies distributions

Identifiers

PMID41218123
PMCPMC12646267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.