ArticlePloS one2025
SH-DETR: Enhancing steel surface defect detection and classification with an improved transformer architecture.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Edge-Enhance YOLO for Steel Surface Defect Detection.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- WMC-DFINE: An Improved DFINE Model for Aluminum Profile Surface Defect Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Design of lightweight metal surface defect detection technology for YOLOv7-tiny using Anchor-Free algorithm.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- DEENet: an edge-enhanced CNN-Transformer dual-encoder model for steel surface defect detection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The detection of defects on steel surfaces constitutes a vital area of research in computer vision, characterized by its complexity and variety, which pose significant difficulties for accurate identification. In this context, we introduce a deep learning framework that combines multi-channel random coding with modules for multi-scale feature fusion to tackle the challenges of low recognition accuracy and insufficient classification power prevalent in conventional models. Our model capitalizes on the self-attention mechanism associated with the Transformer architecture, alongside the strong feature extraction capabilities of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), to facilitate a combined improvement in performance. To start, we enhance the model's feature extraction functionality by incorporating ResNet18 along with global self-attention. Next, we bring forth a novel improvement to the backbone network by adding a multi-channel shuffled encoding module, which effectively encodes various features through the interactions of different convolutional groups, thus minimizing the number of parameters. Additionally, we introduce a multi-feature fusion module UPC-SimAM (upsample concatenated Simple Parameter-Free Attention Module), which is free from parameter redundancy to bolster the model's capacity to merge multi-scale features. Our experiments on the NEU-DET and GC10-DE datasets demonstrate that our model outperforms existing state-of-the-art techniques regarding detection efficiency. Specifically, the model registers a classification accuracy of 91.72%, an mAP@0.5 of 83.03%, and an mAP@0.5:0.95 of 45.55% on the NEU-DET dataset. On the GC10-DE dataset, it achieves a classification precision of 76.73%, an mAP@0.5 of 65.03%, and an mAP@0.5:0.95 of 32.46%. Through detailed ablation studies and visualization experiments, we affirm the considerable potential and benefits of the proposed SH-DETR model in the field of detecting defects on steel surfaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.