Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41218086›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Seizing opportunities: Object neophobia as a factor mediating technical innovation in Goffin´s cockatoos?

Theresa Rössler, Mark O'Hara, Berenika Mioduszewska, Remco Folkertsma, Roger Mundry, Alice M I Auersperg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Theresa RösslerComparative Cognition, Messerli Research Institute, Interdisciplinary Life Sciences, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, University of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2403-8375
Mark O'HaraComparative Cognition, Messerli Research Institute, Interdisciplinary Life Sciences, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, University of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9571-9015
Berenika MioduszewskaComparative Cognition, Messerli Research Institute, Interdisciplinary Life Sciences, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, University of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Remco FolkertsmaComparative Cognition, Messerli Research Institute, Interdisciplinary Life Sciences, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, University of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Roger MundryCognitive Ethology Laboratory, German Primate Center, Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, Göttingen, Germany.
Alice M I AuerspergComparative Cognition, Messerli Research Institute, Interdisciplinary Life Sciences, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, University of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 29075Austrian Science Fund FWF W 1262Austrian Science Fund FWF Y 1309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most studies find substantial inter-individual differences in problem-solving performance within a species, which can drastically influence an individual´s fitness. It has been suggested that innovative behavior can be strongly affected by behavioral traits, such as exploration, persistence, neophilia, and neophobia. Individuals who are more neophobic than others may encounter fewer opportunities or favorable interactions but may also show differences in cognitive ability. We tested eleven captive Goffin's cockatoos (Cacatua goffiniana), a model species for innovative problem-solving, for individual variation in object neophobia and whether it relates to motivation and performance in a problem-solving task. We found no evidence that the less neophobic cockatoos were generally better problem-solvers, nor that they were more eager to engage with the setup after familiarization. Our results suggest that object neophobia in this group of Goffin's cockatoos may not be directly linked to either the ability to innovate or the general motivation to interact with experimental apparatuses. We discuss what these findings could imply for the emergence of innovative behavior as well as the potential limitations of individually tested animals of a highly social species.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalCockatoosProblem SolvingAnimalsFemaleMaleMotivation

Identifiers

PMID41218086
PMCPMC12604780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.