Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41218075›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

Differential effect of supercoiling on bacterial transcription in topological domains.

Boaz Goldberg, Nicolás Yehya, Jie Xiao, Sam Meyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Boaz GoldbergDepartment of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7067-9659
Nicolás YehyaDepartment of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8705-900X
Jie XiaoDepartment of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Sam MeyerDepartment of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7206-6226

Funding

Agence Nationale de la RechercheJohns Hopkins UniversityNational Science Foundation MCB1817551National Science Foundation MCB2412916
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA supercoiling (SC), the over- and under-winding of DNA, is generated by transcription as described in the twin-domain model. Conversely, SC also impacts transcription through torsional stress. SC therefore regulates transcription dynamically and independently of transcription factor binding, particularly in the context of chromosomal topological domains and the activity of topoisomerases in bacteria. In this work, we develop numerical simulations of SC-coupled transcription of a single gene within a topological domain, based on a model incorporating stochastic transcription and activities of topoisomerase I and gyrase. We explore the effect of several parameters not systematically assessed in previous works (role of topoisomerase activities, topological domain size, gene expression strength) and compare the simulation results to a diverse set of experimental observations ranging from in vitro transcription assays to transcriptomics datasets from various species. This model recapitulates the non-monotonic dependence of transcription in vitro with the superhelical density of the plasmid template. Simulations of in vivo transcription in a closed domain exhibit a qualitatively different role for the two topoisomerases, as well as qualitatively different regulatory behaviors depending on the promoter strength. Specifically, topoisomerase I is required for strongly expressed genes that may be hindered by stalled RNA Polymerase, whereas gyrase activity favors the expression of all genes by enhancing transcription initiation and modulating the burstiness of transcription. The simulations exhibit a new mechanism for transcription bursting mediated by negative SC accumulating at the promoter region and modulating the initiation rate, resulting in levels of burstiness compatible with values reported in cells. Finally, we analyze several transcriptomics datasets from a range of evolutionarily distant species and show that topoisomerase inhibition is systematically associated with the repression of highly expressed genes. Simulations show this behavior to occur within a limited parameter range and thus indicate a biologically relevant regime for the simulations. Overall, this work provides a more quantitative description of how SC contributes to differential gene regulation and transcriptional bursting in bacteria.

Indexed as

DNA, BacterialDNA, SuperhelicalModels, GeneticTranscription, GeneticBacteriaComputational BiologyComputer SimulationDNA GyraseDNA Topoisomerases, Type IEscherichia coliGene Expression Regulation, BacterialPromoter Regions, GeneticDNA, BacterialDNA GyraseDNA, SuperhelicalDNA Topoisomerases, Type I

Identifiers

PMID41218075
PMCPMC12622846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.