ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025
Performance evaluation of the diaxxoPCR system for rapid and user-friendly stool-based diagnosis of trichuriasis, ascariasis and strongyloidiasis in Mozambique.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNucleic acid amplification tests have shown promising results for the diagnosis of soil-transmitted helminths (STH). The implementation of real-time PCR (qPCR) in low-resource settings is, however, still hampered by multiple logistical challenges. In this study, we assessed the diagnostic performance of a cartridge-based real-time PCR system (diaxxoPCR) for the detection of DNA of Trichuris trichiura, Ascaris lumbricoides, and Strongyloides stercoralis in clinical samples, using qPCR as the reference test. METHODOLOGY: Initially, a technical validation of the diaxxoPCR system in a singleplex pod (cartridge) design was performed using 37 predefined DNA samples (Study A), followed by a diagnostic comparison between the diaxxoPCR system (singleplex) and qPCR on DNA samples extracted from 325 stools collected in a clinical trial in a rural area of Mozambique (Study B). Finally, one negative and one positive DNA sample were used to demonstrate the technical performance of a multiplex pod design as a potential use-case for the diaxxoPCR system (Study C). PRINCIPAL
findingsStudy A demonstrated that the diaxxoPCR system performed reliably for each of the three STH targets, with minimal intra- and inter-assay variation and sufficient output reproducibility. Study B, performed in Mozambique, showed a positive qPCR result in 57.5% (187), 15.4% (50), and 0.3% (1) of the 325 DNA trial samples for T. trichiura, A. lumbricoides, and S. stercoralis, respectively. The diaxxoPCR system demonstrated sensitivities and specificities above 97% and 94% for each target, resulting in nearly perfect to perfect qualitative agreements with the reference test. Quantitatively, significant and positive associations were seen between the Ct-values (qPCR) and Cq-values (diaxxoPCR). In Study C, the diaxxoPCR system correctly detected all 3 targets in the multiplex pod design.
conclusionWith refinements regarding faecal DNA extraction procedures, the diaxxoPCR system has potential to provide accurate and easy-to-use real-time molecular diagnostics of STH in low resource laboratories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.