ArticlePloS one2025
Hybrid deep learning framework for real-time fault detection in squirrel-cage induction motors.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Fourth Industrial Revolution has heightened the demand for intelligent and reliable predictive maintenance systems in industrial environments. This study proposes a hybrid deep learning-based framework for real-time fault detection in Squirrel-Cage Induction Motors (SCIMs). Utilizing eight deep learning architectures-CNN-GRU, CNN-LSTM, LSTM, BiLSTM, Stacked LSTM, GRU, CNN, and ANN-the framework was trained and tested on a comprehensive dataset comprising one million samples, evenly divided between healthy and faulty motor conditions. Hybrid models, particularly CNN-GRU and CNN-LSTM, achieved classification accuracies of 92.57% and 92.27%, respectively, outperforming the other baseline models across precision, recall, and F1-score by effectively capturing both temporal and spatial features. Beyond classification accuracy, the hybrids further demonstrated computational efficiency in terms of inference time, latency, and throughput, validating their suitability for real-time deployment. The system analyzes real-time sensor data, including torque, speed, power, and stator/rotor currents, to identify various fault types such as short circuits, overloads, mechanical failures, and open circuits. Developed in MATLAB Simulink, the framework demonstrates high accuracy and scalability for real-time deployment. While results are promising, the claims are positioned within the scope of the evaluated models, as direct benchmarking with state-of-the-art methods was not within the present scope. The framework demands substantial computing power and annotated datasets, yet it represents a step toward intelligent, self-aware industrial systems. Future work will focus on model optimization, deployment in resource-constrained environments, and validation with real-world noisy industrial data, explicitly considering sensor drift, varying load conditions, and fault severity levels across diverse motor types and operational scenarios. In addition, since bearing faults account for a significant share of induction motor failures in practice, it will be a key priority to ensure comprehensive industrial applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.