ArticlePloS one2025
Rapid on-site universal vertebrate species identification via multi-barcode nanopore sequencing.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growing illegal wildlife trade (IWT) threatens biodiversity and is a conduit for zoonotic disease, yet its risk of detection is low. Once processed, trafficked species are difficult to identify morphologically, and currently require DNA-based approaches that are time-consuming, costly, and lab-based. There is thus a need for a rapid, cheap, on-site method for species identification. We describe VeRIF-ID (Vertebrate Rapid In-Field Identification via DNA), a method that employs simultaneous on-site nanopore sequencing of four different mitochondrial DNA barcodes. Primers were designed to produce short amplicons to aid analysis of damaged DNA, and to be effective over a broad taxonomic range of vertebrates from lamprey to chimpanzee. Validation demonstrated species-level identification in 91% of 83 tested species, and genus/tribe-level identification of the remaining species (which are also problematic with existing approaches). DNA extraction, PCR and library preparation steps were simplified and optimised so that sampling to species identification takes <3 h for a single sample. Species components are identifiable non-quantitatively in prepared mixtures of muscle tissue from up to five species, and laboratory tests of Traditional East Asian Medicine samples reveal DNA from species including critically endangered saiga antelope and black rhinoceros. In conjunction with a portable Bento Lab device the necessary equipment and reagents are easily portable, and we apply the method to analyse seized bushmeat and fish samples within an airport customs zone, identifying mammal and fish species in 15 samples within 6 h. The initial equipment costs for VeRIF-ID are ~ $8K, and the cost per sample of ~$10-48 (depending on set-up), considerably cheaper than current conventional lab-based approaches. The method requires only basic hands-on skills. Ongoing trials with potential end-users will focus on establishing forensic reporting criteria prior to casework implementation. Future development of user-friendly bioinformatic interfaces will aim to fully democratise species identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.