ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery2026
Speech Rehabilitation with Free Lateral Upper Arm Flap after Total or Subtotal Laryngectomy in Patients with Advanced Laryngeal Cancer.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRestoration of speech after total laryngectomy (TLG) remains challenging. This study evaluated the feasibility of free lateral upper arm flap (LUAF) reconstruction of a laryngeal phonatory tube and compared postoperative voice outcomes with esophageal speech (ES).
methodsThe authors retrospectively reviewed 74 men with advanced laryngeal cancer treated between 2019 and 2024. Twenty-three patients underwent LUAF reconstruction of a phonatory tube following TLG or subtotal laryngectomy, while 51 patients received postoperative ES training. Voice outcomes at 3 months were assessed using subjective ratings, objective acoustic measures, and voice-related quality-of-life questionnaires. The mean follow-up time was 28 months.
resultsTwenty of 23 flaps survived uneventfully, and 3 patients developed transient pharyngeal fistulas. All patients in the LUAF group regained phonation, whereas 26 of 51 patients achieved ES. Compared with ES, LUAF reconstruction resulted in significantly better fundamental frequency, sound pressure level, maximum phonation time, harmonics-to-noise ratio, speech recognition, and lower speech effort (all P < 0.05). Daily communication satisfaction, speech naturalness, and intelligibility were comparable between groups, but swallowing function was inferior in the LUAF group ( P < 0.05). No tumor recurrence was observed in the LUAF cohort during follow-up.
conclusionsFree LUAF reconstruction provides reliable restoration of phonation after TLG or subtotal laryngectomy with acceptable donor-site morbidity. Compared with ES, this technique enables more consistent voice acquisition and superior voice quality, representing a feasible reconstructive option for speech rehabilitation in selected patients with advanced laryngeal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.