ArticleUrology practice2026
Patient-Reported Outcomes Following UGN-102 Treatment in Low-Grade Intermediate-Risk Nonmuscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: An Analysis of 3 Clinical Trials.
Article in Urology practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionUGN-102 is a reverse thermal hydrogel formulation of mitomycin indicated for nonsurgical intravesical treatment of recurrent low-grade intermediate-risk nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer (LG-IR-NMIBC). This analysis evaluates patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for quality of life (QoL), functioning, and symptom burden across 3 late-phase clinical trials of UGN-102.
methodsOPTIMA II (Phase 2b), ATLAS (Phase 3), and ENVISION (Phase 3, pivotal) were included. The Quality-of-Life Questionnaire for NMIBC (QLQ-NMIBC24) was administered in each trial and the QLQ-Core 30 was administered in ENVISION. Mean baseline PRO scores and changes from baseline were calculated for each trial. Minimal clinically important differences were used to identify clinically meaningful changes. QLQ-NMIBC24 urinary symptom scores were assessed in patients with and without urinary treatment-emergent adverse events with UGN-102 in ATLAS and ENVISION.
resultsPRO completion rates (ATLAS and ENVISION) were generally ≥ 90%. Mean baseline PRO scores were mostly indicative of low patient-perceived symptom burden and high level of functioning and QoL. Most PRO scores were similar to or better than baseline during and after UGN-102 treatment across trials. In ATLAS, clinically meaningful improvements from baseline in QLQ-NMIBC24 urinary symptoms, future worries, malaise, and bloating/flatulence were observed from month 3 up to month 18 or 21. Urinary treatment-emergent adverse event occurrence during UGN-102 treatment was associated with transient worsening in mean QLQ-NMIBC24 urinary symptom scores that resolved by the 3-month visit.
conclusionsIn these analyses, patients with LG-IR-NMIBC receiving UGN-102 did not report worsening QoL, functioning, or symptom burden, supporting its use as a nonsurgical treatment for LG-IR-NMIBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.