Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41217815›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2025

Gait Rehabilitation Using Hybrid Assistive Limb in Patients With Lower Limb Amputation: Protocol for a Single-Arm Clinical Trial.

Makoto Asaeda, Naoya Orita, Masashi Shimada, Yoshifumi Kono, Kiyo Ueda, Takeya Araki, Naoto Fujita, Yukio Mikami

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Makoto AsaedaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9323-8146
Naoya OritaDivision of Rehabilitation, Department of Clinical Practice and Support, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-5402-4874
Masashi ShimadaDivision of Rehabilitation, Department of Clinical Practice and Support, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4688-2785
Yoshifumi KonoDivision of Rehabilitation, Department of Clinical Practice and Support, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6441-1413
Kiyo UedaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.ORCID 0009-0003-6451-7455
Takeya ArakiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.ORCID 0009-0002-3917-9397
Naoto FujitaBio-environmental Adaptation Sciences, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9416-3502
Yukio MikamiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.ORCID 0009-0005-8454-4279

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLower limb amputation rates are increasing owing to aging and vascular diseases. However, no standardized rehabilitation protocol has been established for regaining walking ability. Conventional rehabilitation delays prosthetic gait training until 6-8 weeks post amputation, prolonging recovery and increasing medical expenses.

objectiveThis study aims to evaluate the impact of neurorehabilitation using the Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) for Medical Use Lower Limb Type, developed by Japan's Tsukuba University and the robotics company Cyberdyne, on gait acquisition, improvement in activities of daily living (ADL), and enhancement of quality of life (QOL) in patients with lower limb amputation, and assess the effectiveness of early HAL-assisted gait training before and after amputation.

methodsThis single-arm trial will include 20 patients undergoing unilateral transfemoral or transtibial amputations. HAL-assisted gait training will be performed 5 days per week (30 minutes per session) until postoperative week 8. The primary outcome is a 2-minute walking distance, while secondary outcomes include muscle strength, balance, gait parameters, and ADL/QOL measures. Statistical analyses will be conducted using SPSS (IBM Corp), and results obtained at the following time points will be compared: preoperative, postintervention, and 6-month follow-up.

resultsThe planned sample size is 20 patients, calculated using JMP version 12 (SAS Institute) based on an expected 1.5-fold improvement in 6-minute walk distance (effect size 0.8, α=.05, power=0.8). Analyses will be performed using SPSS version 15.0 (IBM Corp). The 2-minute walk test (primary outcome) and secondary outcomes will be compared at baseline, post intervention, and 6-month follow-up using 1-way analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis test, and P values <.05 and 95% CIs will be reported.

conclusionsThis is the first study to apply HAL-assisted neurorehabilitation to patients with lower limb amputations. Early gait training may increase prosthetic gait acquisition rates, shorten rehabilitation and hospitalization periods, and reduce medical costs. If effective, this study may contribute to the development of a Japan-originated rehabilitation program and provide clinical evidence supporting broader HAL implementation for patients with lower limb amputations.

trial registrationJapan Registry of Clinical Trials jRCTs062200031; https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCTs062200031. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/76509.

Indexed as

Amputation, SurgicalArtificial LimbsGaitLower ExtremityNeurological RehabilitationActivities of Daily LivingAdultAgedClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeWalkingamputationgait rehabilitationHybrid Assistive Limbprostheticsquality of life, activities of daily living

Identifiers

PMID41217815
PMCPMC12648125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.