Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41217752›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

Biologic Drug Prices in Medicare Part B After Entry of Biosimilars to the Market.

Abdullah Abdelaziz, Aaron N Winn, Stacie B Dusetzina, Aaron P Mitchell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abdullah AbdelazizDepartment of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago.
Aaron N WinnDepartment of Pharmacy Systems, Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago.
Stacie B DusetzinaDepartment of Health Policy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Aaron P MitchellDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Price reductions for originator biologics with biosimilar competitors have been modest in the US. This may be due to the US reimbursement model, where clinicians or their employing medical institution receive payment based on the percentage of the cost billed, incentivizing the highest-cost product. Currently, US policymakers are debating changing this policy. However, a clear understanding of price reductions achieved by the current system is needed to inform future reform efforts. Objective: To assess the associations of biosimilar entry with the prices of originator biologics under Medicare Part B reimbursement. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used bayesian structural time series models to analyze Medicare Part B Drug average sales price (ASP) data from quarter 1 of 2005 to quarter 1 of 2025, including 7 biologics with biosimilars available for at least 3 years (bevacizumab, epoetin, filgrastim, infliximab, pegfilgrastim, rituximab, and trastuzumab). Exposure: Biosimilar entry. Main Outcomes and Measures: Relative differences in observed ASPs for originators and biosimilars vs the bayesian structural time series-estimated counterfactual ASPs for originators had biosimilars not entered the market. Results: Analysis included 7 originator biologics that entered the market between 1989 and 2024. The number of biosimilars marketed during the study period ranged between 1 and 6 for originator biologics studied. Biosimilar entry was associated with changes in the ASP of the originator biologic of -7.4% (95% prediction interval, -10.5% to -4.3%) at 1 year, -31.7% (95% prediction interval, -41.6% to -21.9%) at 3 years, and -43.1% (95% prediction interval, -61.3% to -24.8%) at 5 years. Savings varied by drug, with the largest price reductions observed with pegfilgrastim and infliximab, with 5-year price reductions of -82.0% (95% prediction interval, -95.2% to -54.0%) for pegfilgrastim and -62.3% (95% prediction interval, -73.4% to -45.2%) for infliximab. Biosimilar prices were generally lower than the originator biologics at all postentry periods and decreased over time. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, counterfactual analysis found that price reductions from biosimilar entry were more substantial than suggested by simpler pre-post comparisons. However, these savings remained less than those achieved by small-molecule generics, highlighting the need for policy reforms to enhance market competition and realize greater savings.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsDrug CostsMedicare Part BBayes TheoremCost SavingsReimbursement MechanismsUnited StatesBiological ProductsBiosimilar Pharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID41217752
PMCPMC12606378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.