SynthesisMusculoskeletal surgery2026
The outcomes of acetabular impaction bone grafting using allografts in uncemented cups for acetabular bone loss: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Musculoskeletal surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAcetabular bone loss poses a significant challenge in total hip arthroplasty (THA), especially during revision procedures. Impaction bone grafting (IBG) using allografts with uncemented cups is established as a biological reconstruction technique which aims to restore bone stock and achieve a stable fixation. However, there are inconsistent reports regarding its outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of IBG with uncemented cups in acetabular bone loss.
methodsA comprehensive literature search of five databases: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane, and Web of Science was completed. Studies reporting functional outcomes and/or complications of IBG in uncemented THA were included. 20 studies, all observational, involving 1166 THAs in 1122 patients met prespecified inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis was conducted for these outcomes, and heterogeneity was assessed.
resultsMeta-analysis revealed significant improvement in mean Harris Hip Score (HHS) of 41.51 (95% CI: 35.71-47.30). Pooled complication rates were low: aseptic loosening (7%; 95% CI: 4%-13%), infection (4%; 95% CI: 3%-5%), need for revision (9%; 95% CI: 6%-14%), and mortality (4%; 95% CI: 2%-11%). There was considerable heterogeneity in the results, reflecting methodological variation across studies.
conclusionsIBG with uncemented cups suggests meaningful functional improvement and generally acceptable complication rates in managing acetabular bone loss, particularly in revision THA. However, the current evidence base is limited by risk of bias, high heterogeneity, observational study designs, and lack of defect stratification. Future studies should focus on randomised controlled trials to better optimise surgical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41217730What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.