Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41217729›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2026

Aesthetic experience is supported by spontaneous autobiographical memory recollection.

Anna P Smith, Felipe De Brigard, Elizabeth J Marsh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anna P SmithDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, 417 Chapel Drive, Durham, NC, 27708, USA. anna.p.smith@duke.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1365-0809
Felipe De BrigardDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, 417 Chapel Drive, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0169-1360
Elizabeth J MarshDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, 417 Chapel Drive, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0456-9547

Funding

Charles Lafitte Foundation Graduate Research Award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

What mental representations and processes support moving aesthetic reactions to abstract art? We argue that the elicitation of autobiographical memories enables viewers to appreciate abstract art through the process of personal meaning-making. In three studies, we gave participants the opportunity to associate personal memories with works of art and measured how aesthetically moved they felt while viewing. We found that participants were significantly more moved by paintings that they could associate with a specific episode in their life (Study 1). This effect replicated across all studies and was present, albeit slightly weaker, even when the memory was cued after aesthetic ratings was made (Study 2). However, the positive effect of memory association on aesthetic experience diminished significantly when participants were asked to associate memories with all paintings (Study 3). These findings suggest that memory recollection enhances aesthetic experience when it arises spontaneously during art viewing.

Indexed as

EstheticsMemory, EpisodicMental RecallAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultAesthetic experienceAutobiographical memorySelf-relevance

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.