Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41217706›Full record

ArticleJournal of bioethical inquiry2025

Traditional Healthcare Practitioners' Views on Informed Consent in African Traditional Medicine: A Qualitative Study in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

F F Akpa-Inyang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bioethical inquiry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

F F Akpa-InyangCollege of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa. Akpainyangf1@ukzn.ac.za.ORCID 0000-0002-3351-4126

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

African traditional medicine provides treatment for various illnesses and is widely used across Africa since it is readily available and affordable. Concepts of informed consent, however, are grounded in a Western ethical tradition that foregrounds the individual's rights to autonomy and bodily integrity. This study aimed to explore whether the basic elements of informed consent-information disclosure, comprehension, voluntariness, and agreement-are observed in traditional medicine practice in KwaZulu-Natal province, South Africa. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with eight traditional healers-four nyanga and four sangoma, and thematic content analysis was applied to the transcribed and translated data. Four major themes emerged from this analysis: 1) the practice of traditional medicine in KwaZulu-Natal; 2) the importance and amount of information disclosure by traditional healers; 3) methods used to obtain consent or agreement from patients and the voluntariness of this process; 4) the benefits of and barriers to obtaining informed consent in African traditional medicine. The study found that African traditional healers do indeed disclose information on diagnosis, risks, benefits, and treatment options to their patients.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDisclosureHealth PersonnelInformed ConsentMedicine, African TraditionalAdultComprehensionFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPersonal AutonomyQualitative ResearchSouth AfricaAfrican ethicsAfrican traditional medicineBothoEmpirical bioethicsInformed consentNyangaSangomaUbuntu

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.