ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
Initial clinical experience with the da Vinci 5 in transoral robotic surgery.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Transoral robotic surgery for glottic squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and patient-level analysis of surgical, functional, and oncologic outcomes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To describe early clinical experience using the multi-port da Vinci 5 (DV5) system for transoral robotic surgery (TORS) reporting perioperative outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed all DV5 TORS procedures performed at a single institution. Demographics, tumor characteristics, operative metrics, complications, adjuvant therapy, and early follow-up were extracted from electronic records and operative/pathology reports. Seven DV5 TORS cases were performed: five HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCC), one diagnostic tonsillectomy for suspected lymphoma, and one benign parapharyngeal hemangioma. Among malignant resections (n = 5), the pT stage was T1 (n = 2) and T2 (n = 3), and all were HPV-related. Across all seven cases, there were no tracheotomies, and one postoperative hemorrhage (14.3%) required embolization. All patients were discharged on the first postoperative day after starting a liquid oral diet. Final margins were negative in all patients with one patient having positive margin requiring re-resection. DV5-assisted TORS was feasible and safe in this initial experience. Perioperative outcomes were comparable to those of historical MP and SP series. Prospective multi-center studies are critical to clarify comparative oncologic and functional outcomes between different surgical robots.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41217687What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.