Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41217659›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025

Subxiphoid two-port robotic vs video-assisted thymic surgery: a single-center propensity-matched analysis of perioperative outcomes.

Kayishaer Ainiwaer, Yueying Yang, Abulajiang Kamili, Yunfei Gao, Ao Li, Dongbo Luo

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kayishaer AiniwaerDepartment of Thoracic Surgery II, Xinjiang Medical University Affiliated Tumor Hospital, No. 789 Suzhou East Street, Xinshi District, Urumqi City, 830011, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China.
Yueying YangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery II, Xinjiang Medical University Affiliated Tumor Hospital, No. 789 Suzhou East Street, Xinshi District, Urumqi City, 830011, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China.
Abulajiang KamiliDepartment of Thoracic Surgery II, Xinjiang Medical University Affiliated Tumor Hospital, No. 789 Suzhou East Street, Xinshi District, Urumqi City, 830011, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China.
Yunfei GaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery II, Xinjiang Medical University Affiliated Tumor Hospital, No. 789 Suzhou East Street, Xinshi District, Urumqi City, 830011, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China.
Ao LiThe Third Clinical Medical College of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, 830011, Xinjiang, China.
Dongbo LuoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery II, Xinjiang Medical University Affiliated Tumor Hospital, No. 789 Suzhou East Street, Xinshi District, Urumqi City, 830011, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, China. 13999891258@139.com.

Funding

Regional Collaborative Innovation Special Project for Xinjiang (Science and Technological Aid Programme for Xinjiang) No. 2024E02061.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) has emerged as a new option for treating mediastinal tumors, offering advantages of high precision and minimal invasiveness. This study uses a subxyphoid approach to compare the short-term outcomes of RATS versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for anterior mediastinal lesions; additionally, it assesses the short-term outcomes ofsubxyphoid bilateral port placement for these lesions and provides a preliminary evaluation of dual-port robotic assistance in terms of safety and feasibility. A retrospective analysis of patients treated at the Third Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University from May 2020 to May 2025, who had preoperative CT evidence of anterior mediastinal lesions and underwent RATS or VATS. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used, and Love plots were generated to evaluate balance post-matching; perioperative outcomes between groups were compared with Holm correction for multiple testing. Finally, CUSUM/sequential analysis was used to assess the dynamic changes in operative time and intraoperative blood loss. A total of 88 patients were included (VATS 58, RATS 30). After PSM, the RATS group showed advantages in several perioperative outcomes: median operative time significantly shorter (80.0 [60.0, 100.0] minutes vs. 110.0 [90.0, 120.0] minutes, P < 0.001); intraoperative blood loss significantly reduced to 50.0 [20.0, 100.0] mL, compared with 100.0 [100.0, 200.0] mL in the VATS group, P = 0.001; postoperative white blood cell count lower (7.18 ± 1.92 × 10^9/L vs. 13.13 ± 2.69 × 10^9/L, P < 0.001); total drainage decreased to 150.0 [0.0, 200.0] mL, vs. 385.0 [20.5, 500.0] mL in the VATS group, P = 0.001; postoperative length of stay shorter (3.0 [1.0, 4.0] days vs. 5.0 [4.0, 6.0] days, P < 0.001). These results suggest that RATS may be associated with less trauma. For anterior mediastinal tumor resections, the perioperative outcomes of subxiphoid two-port robot-assisted surgery were comparable to VATS in terms of efficacy, with good safety and feasibility.

Indexed as

Mediastinal NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresThoracic Surgery, Video-AssistedThymectomyThymus NeoplasmsAdultAgedBlood Loss, SurgicalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnterior mediastinumERASPropensity scoreRobotic thymectomySubxiphoid approachVATS

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.