Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41217655›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research communications2025

Oral probiotic and postbiotic supplementation enhances the abundance of Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus johnsonii, and Limosilactobacillus reuteri in both canine skin and gastrointestinal microbiota: insights from long-read 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

Manijeh Mohammadi Dehcheshmeh, Letitia Grant, Esmaeil Ebrahimie, Aliakbar Khabiri, Farhid Hemmatzadeh, Michael Shipstone, Darren J Trott

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Manijeh Mohammadi DehcheshmehAustralian Centre for Antimicrobial Resistance Ecology, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, SA, 5371, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8019-4081
Letitia GrantDermatology for Animals, 45 Hayward Street, Stafford, Qld, 4053, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-2440-0834
Esmaeil EbrahimieAustralian Centre for Antimicrobial Resistance Ecology, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, SA, 5371, Australia. esmaeil.ebrahimie@adelaide.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4431-2861
Aliakbar KhabiriSchool of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2766-4080
Farhid HemmatzadehAustralian Centre for Antimicrobial Resistance Ecology, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, SA, 5371, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4572-8869
Michael ShipstoneDermatology for Animals, 45 Hayward Street, Stafford, Qld, 4053, Australia.
Darren J TrottAustralian Centre for Antimicrobial Resistance Ecology, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, SA, 5371, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8297-5770

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral daily probiotic and postbiotic supplementation (ODPPS) is a promising strategy for canine skin and gut health. Despite growing interest, the effects of ODPPS on the composition of the canine gut and skin microbiota remain largely unexplored. The advent of full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing has opened new avenues in microbiome research, significantly enhancing the accuracy and completeness of microbial community profiling. This study employed PacBio long-read sequencing to profile longitudinal changes in canine fecal microbiota composition during ODPPS. Then, we evaluated the parallel dynamics between fecal and skin microbiota responses to ODPPS, addressing a critical gap in understanding systemic microbiome interactions in dogs. By Day 90, fecal microbiota composition shifted significantly (PERMANOVA p = 0.05), with increased beneficial bacteria by Day 30 and further by Day 90. In both axillae and fecal microbiota, ODPPS supplementation increased the relative abundance of beneficial species including Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactobacillus johnsonii, and Limosilactobacillus reuteri. A significant positive Pearson correlation was found between the relative abundances of these bacteria in the skin and fecal microbiota (p = 0.05), suggesting a coordinated microbial response across body sites. The results highlight the significance of Lactobacillus acidophilus as a core probiotic strain, demonstrating exceptional capacity for colonisation and establishment in both the gastrointestinal and skin niches of dogs. These findings show the systemic influence of ODPPS in shaping microbial communities across both sites and support its use to promote overall canine health. Collectively, our results offer robust evidence for the dual benefits of daily oral ODPPS on both skin and gut microbiota.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeLactobacillus acidophilusLactobacillus johnsoniiLimosilactobacillus reuteriProbioticsSkinAdministration, OralAnimal FeedAnimalsDietDietary SupplementsDogsFecesFemaleMaleRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SCanine gut microbiomeCanine skin microbiomeGut-skin axisLactobacillus spp.Oral probiotic supplementation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.