Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41217646›Full record

ArticleDiscover oncology2025

Development of machine learning models for survival prediction in nasopharyngeal carcinoma using population-based data.

Guoxiang Lin, Qiyan Mo, Lu Han, Shaohan Sun, Zhiqiang Xiao, Weiming Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Machine learning prognostication in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a european multicentre analysis of survival and risk of second malignancy.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Guoxiang LinResearch Center of Carcinogenesis and Targeted Therapy, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
Qiyan MoDepartment of Oncology, Wuming Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, No. 26 Yong Ning Road, Wuming District, Guangxi, 530199, Nanning, China.
Lu HanDepartment of Oncology, Wuming Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, No. 26 Yong Ning Road, Wuming District, Guangxi, 530199, Nanning, China.
Shaohan SunDepartment of Oncology, Wuming Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, No. 26 Yong Ning Road, Wuming District, Guangxi, 530199, Nanning, China.
Zhiqiang Xiao *Research Center of Carcinogenesis and Targeted Therapy, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, No. 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China. zhiqiangxiao@xsu.edu.cn.
Weiming Zhang *Department of Oncology, Wuming Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, No. 26 Yong Ning Road, Wuming District, Guangxi, 530199, Nanning, China.

Funding

Basic Ability Enhancement Project of Young Teachers in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region 2022KY0075Basic Ability Enhancement Project of Young Teachers in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region 2024KY0095Basic Ability Enhancement Project of Young Teachers in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region 2025KY0166Youth Science Foundation of Guangxi Medical University GXMUYSF202354Youth Science Foundation of Guangxi Medical University GXMUYSF202450Youth Science Foundation of Guangxi Medical University GXMUYSF202551
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite significant improvements in treatment efficacy, nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) remains one of the most common and threatening head and neck cancers. This study sought to build a risk stratification model that categorizes NPC patients into distinct prognostic groups based on readily available demographic and clinical variables, with the goal of enhancing patient care and improving survival rates.

methodsData for patients diagnosed with NPC between 2010 and 2018 were obtained from the SEER program. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression were applied to evaluate the effects of treatment modalities on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Prognostic variables from multivariable Cox models were used to construct nomograms for predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS and CSS. Several survival-focused machine learning algorithms, including the random survival forest (RSF), were trained and compared using the concordance index (C-index) and integrated Brier score. An interactive web-based calculator was developed based on the best-performing model.

resultsThe analysis included 9,816 patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2020. Combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy significantly improved survival in locoregionally advanced and advanced NPC compared with other treatment regimens. Cox-based nomograms achieved a C-index of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.70-0.72), outperforming the conventional staging system. The RSF model demonstrated the highest prognostic accuracy, with C-indices of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.71-0.74) for 3-year OS and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.73-0.76) for 5-year OS. The RSF algorithm was implemented as a free online survival prediction tool.

conclusionMachine learning based models, particularly the RSF algorithm, provide improved individualized survival predictions for NPC. While performance was promising, further external validation and inclusion of additional clinical and molecular predictors are needed before clinical adoption. We also developed an interactive web-based survival prediction tool, enabling clinicians and researchers to obtain individualized survival probabilities in real time.

Indexed as

Cancer-specific survivalMachine learning algorithmNasopharyngeal carcinomaSurvival predictionSurvival probability calculator

Identifiers

PMID41217646
PMCPMC12605841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.