Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41217554›Full record

SynthesisClinical and experimental medicine2025

Clinical outcomes and safety of CD47-targeted immunotherapies across hematologic malignancies: a systematic review of monoclonal antibodies and fusion proteins in combination strategies.

Wajahat Mirza, Sundas Dadan, Eshan Ahmad, Ayesha Junaid, Tariq Mahmood Satti

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wajahat MirzaShifa College of Medicine, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan. wajahatmirza.clinicalresearch@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-9811-7754
Sundas DadanSenior Research Associate, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Eshan AhmadShifa College of Medicine, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Ayesha JunaidHead of Hematology and Blood Transfusion Department, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Tariq Mahmood SattiChief of Heme-Oncology Department, Shifa International Hospital, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe CD47-SIRPα axis is a key innate immune checkpoint that enables tumor cells to evade macrophage-mediated clearance. CD47 is overexpressed in a spectrum of hematologic malignancies, contributing to poor outcomes, particularly in high-risk biological subgroups. While early clinical trials of CD47 blockade demonstrated limited efficacy as monotherapy, combination strategies have emerged as promising approaches. This systematic review synthesizes the current clinical evidence on the outcomes and safety of CD47-targeted monoclonal antibodies and fusion proteins administered in combination with regimens for hematologic malignancies.

methodsA comprehensive search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and clinical trial registries was conducted until May 2025. Prospective interventional trials evaluating CD47-targeted agents in combination with systemic therapies for hematologic malignancies were included. The outcomes of interest were response rate, survival, and safety. The methodological quality was assessed using the MINORS. The protocol for this review was prospectively registered in the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (registration number: CRD420251071435).

resultsNine prospective clinical trials enrolling over 800 patients were included in this study. In patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), the combination of magrolimab and azacitidine achieved an overall response rate (ORR) of 63%, with a complete remission (CR) rate exceeding 30%, including in patients with TP53-mutant disease. In untreated AML, the ORR reached 65%, with durable responses observed in patients with adverse cytogenetic mutations. In relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), combinations of CD47 blockade with anti-CD20 antibodies ± chemotherapy or novel immunotherapeutics achieved an ORR of 33-52%, with CR rates of up to 33%. In indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma, magrolimab plus rituximab produced an ORR of 74% and a CR of 39%, including in rituximab-refractory patients. Preliminary data on multiple myeloma have demonstrated encouraging activity in triple-class refractory diseases. Across malignancies, CD47-targeted combinations were well tolerated, with manageable anemia and no unexpected toxicity.

conclusionsCD47-targeted combinations demonstrate encouraging early phase efficacy and manageable safety in hematologic malignancies, with signals of benefit in higher-risk MDS, TP53-mutant AML, relapsed/refractory DLBCL, and rituximab-refractory iNHL. However, recent Phase III trials in newly diagnosed AML Daver et al. [27], and Zeidner et al. [26] did not confirm this benefit, underscoring that CD47 blockade remains investigational and requires validation in rigorously designed randomized studies.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCD47 AntigenHematologic NeoplasmsImmunotherapyRecombinant Fusion ProteinsHumansTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, MonoclonalCD47 AntigenCD47 protein, humanRecombinant Fusion ProteinsAcute myeloid leukemiaCD47-targeted immunotherapyDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaHematologic malignanciesIndolent non-Hodgkin lymphomaInnate immune checkpointMyelodysplastic syndromesSIRPα

Identifiers

PMID41217554
PMCPMC12605519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.