ArticleEnvironmental geochemistry and health2025
Uranium concentration in children's hair samples and residential soil samples near mine tailings facilities, in Johannesburg, South Africa.
Article in Environmental geochemistry and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Communities near gold mine tailings are at risk of exposure to toxic substances, with children being particularly vulnerable. This comparative cross-sectional study evaluated uranium concentrations in hair samples collected from children and in soil samples from their residential areas near gold mine tailings in Johannesburg(exposed group) and compared them with those from Durban reference sites (unexposed group). A total of 406 participants aged 0-18 years were included. Out of those participants 208 were from Johannesburg (exposed group) and 198 were from Durban (unexposed group). Data collection involved the collection of hair and soil samples, administration of questionnaires, and anthropometric measurements. Most participants were female (54.2%). The mean age was 10 years (SD = 9.6). The majority of participants families (60.3%) relied solely on social grants. The median uranium concentration was significantly higher in the exposed group (17.07 µg/kg; range: 0.73-323) than in the unexposed group (8.12 µg/kg; range: 0.47-1131, p < 0.001). Girls (18.83 µg/kg) had higher uranium levels than boys (7.92 µg/kg) (p < 0.001), and younger children (not yet attending school) had the highest concentrations (18.67 µg/kg) (p < 0.001). Among the exposed group, girls (23.50 µg/kg) had higher uranium levels than boys (11.77 µg/kg), and children not yet attending school (21.31 µg/kg) and those attending preschool (25.37 µg/kg) had the highest concentrations. Targeted public health interventions and environmental mitigation strategies are necessary to reduce exposure risks in affected communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.