ArticleNeuroradiology2025
MRI-based prediction of DNA methylation grade in IDH-mutant astrocytomas using qualitative imaging features and tumor volumetrics.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeHistopathological grading of IDH-mutant astrocytomas demonstrates limited prognostic accuracy. However, DNA methylation subclassification has demonstrated improved prognostication beyond histological grading. This study aimed to investigate the associations between imaging features, tumor volumetric data, and DNA methylation grade in IDH-mutant astrocytomas.
methodsWe analyzed imaging features and volumetric data for 72 patients diagnosed with IDH-mutant astrocytomas, who underwent preoperative MRI and DNA methylation profiling. VASARI features and multicompartmental volumetrics were evaluated. Logistic regression was used to identify imaging predictors of methylation subclass, WHO histologic grade, copy number variation (CNV), and CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were also developed to assess these variables' influence on overall survival and progression-free survival.
resultsPatients were classified into 27 methylation high-grade (A_IDH_HG) and 45 methylation low-grade (A_IDH_LG) tumors. Tumor volumes and proportions varied by methylation grade, CNV status, and WHO histologic grade, but not by CDKN2A/B status. Imaging features distinguished methylation subclasses with 75% accuracy (AUC = 0.77). Methylation high-grade subclass was associated with imaging features such as midline crossing, ependymal extension, and poorly defined enhancing margins. Predictive performance for WHO histologic grade, CNV status, and CDKN2A/B deletion was moderate (AUC = 0.67, 0.69, and 0.65, respectively). Methylation grade, CDKN2A/B status, VASARI features, and proportions of edema and non-contrast enhancing tumor were significantly associated with survival.
conclusionMRI-derived imaging features facilitate noninvasive prediction of DNA methylation subclass in IDH-mutant astrocytomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41217503What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.