Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41217474›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2026

Early and delayed post-cesarean complications: an imaging review.

Nicholas A Zacharias, Ananya Panda, Amr Elmahdy, Margarita V Revzin, Yashant Aswani

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicholas A ZachariasDepartment of Radiology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Ananya PandaDepartment of Radiology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Amr ElmahdyUniversity Hospitals of Leicester, Infirmary Square, Leicester, LE1 5WW, UK.
Margarita V RevzinYale school of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Yashant AswaniDepartment of Radiology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA. aswaniyashant@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cesarean delivery is a common procedure, currently accounting for one-third of live births in the US. In the acute post-operative setting, it can be difficult to distinguish changes of the expected recovery of the uterus from those of complications. A radiologist should be able to recognize expected postoperative findings and their evolution, such as endometrial cavity debris, small hematoma, or peri-incisional edema, when interpreting images at various stages of recovery. Commonly seen acute complications after cesarean delivery include subfascial and bladder flap hematomas, uterine dehiscence or rupture, endometritis, septic thrombophlebitis, retained products of conception, and vascular complications such as uterine artery pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, and ovarian vein thrombosis. On the contrary, delayed complications include uterine scar niche, cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy, endometriosis, pelvic inflammatory disease, bowel obstruction, that occur beyond the post-partum period and are often manifested during subsequent pregnancies. This review aims to familiarize radiologists with the pathophysiology and timeline of the expected post-cesarean imaging findings and complications, to aid accurate diagnosis and prompt patient management.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionPostoperative ComplicationsFemaleHumansPregnancyCesarean scar ectopic pregnancyNormal post-cesarean delivery imagingPlacenta accreta spectrumPost-cesarean delivery complicationPost-cesarean delivery hematomaUterine dehiscenceUterine ruptureUterine scar niche

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.