ArticleApplied psychology. Health and well-being2025
Exploring reciprocal within-person relations between proactive employee green behavior and subjective well-being: A four-wave longitudinal study.
Article in Applied psychology. Health and well-being, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring reciprocal within-person relations between proactive employee green behavior and subjective well-being: A four-wave longitudinal study.Applied psychology. Health and well-being · 2025Article
- Climate change knowledge is associated with greater worry but less anxiety about climate change.The journal of climate change and healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A promising approach for organizations to advance environmental sustainability and ensure the long-term well-being of humanity is to encourage employees to proactively address environmental issues. However, the understanding of how proactive employee green behavior (EGB) is associated with the well-being of employees engaging in such behavior is currently limited. This is problematic, as the potential co-benefits of proactive EGB and well-being may motivate employees to engage in proactive EGB and encourage organizations to promote environmental and well-being goals simultaneously. Based on data from n = 1354 employees in Germany collected across four measurement points separated by 3-month time lags, we examine how proactive EGB and work-related subjective well-being (i.e., job satisfaction and positive and negative affect) are related to one another over time. Results of random intercept cross-lagged panel models did not provide support for effects of proactive EGB on subsequent well-being. However, higher positive affect predicted a subsequent increase in proactive EGB. Additionally, we found that the positive within-person association between job satisfaction and subsequent proactive EGB was stronger among employees who perceived stronger organizational pro-environmental norms. These findings highlight the importance of promoting subjective well-being and organizational pro-environmental norms to support employee initiative that addresses environmental issues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.