ArticleTurkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation2026
Knowledge, Practices, and Awareness Regarding Out-of-operating Room Sedation Among Non-anaesthesia Health Professionals: A Questionnaire Study.
Article in Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The efficacy and safety of sedation administered by non-anaesthesia healthcare professionals should be evaluated within the framework of evidence-based protocols, and approaches should be adopted to ensure patient safety at the highest level. We aimed, with a scientific approach, to evaluate non-operating-room anaesthesia applications performed by non-anaesthesia health professionals in terms of patient safety, quality, and consistency, and to identify areas of deficiency. Methods: After obtaining ethical approval, a questionnaire was prepared to evaluate practitioners' awareness of the anaesthesia and sedation processes administered to patients during procedures performed in their clinics. An electronic questionnaire (Google Form) was used to collect data. Results: This study revealed that non-operating-room sedation applications are widely practiced across various specialties in our country, but levels of knowledge and skill regarding these applications are not standardized. Extending in-service training, developing practical skills in managing complications, and using objective criteria for patient follow-up after sedation are of great importance for patient safety and clinical efficacy. Conclusion: Standardization of sedation practices can be achieved through multidisciplinary cooperation and the adoption of protocols based on current guidelines. In this context, it is recommended that structured training programs and clinical guidelines be established for non-anaesthesia healthcare professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.