An integrated integral projection model (IPM

Abigail G Keller, Benjamin R Goldstein, Leah Skare, Perry de Valpine

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

1citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

An integrated integral projection model (IPMThe Journal of animal ecology · 2026
Article

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Abigail G KellerDepartment of Environment Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6068-0173

Benjamin R GoldsteinDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8015-7494

Leah SkareNorthwest Straits Commission, Washington Department of Ecology, Mount Vernon, Washington, USA.

Perry de ValpineDepartment of Environment Science, Policy, and Management, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8329-6796

Funding

Advanced Scientific Computing Research DE-SC0024386Fisheries and Oceans CanadaNational Science Foundation DBI-1942280U.S. Geological Survey

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Body size is one of the most important traits governing individual-level demographic rates and modulating population-level processes. Multiple size-dependent demographic rates can simultaneously change population structure, so distinguishing their individual contributions to overall population dynamics remains a challenge. Disentangling size-dependent harvest rates from other demographic rates is critical for assessing the impact of removal on populations of invasive species. Inference about invasive populations can be difficult, however, as observations are often collected opportunistically as part of removal programs, rather than experimentally designed. Yet accurate inference is essential for understanding the feasibility of population suppression and optimising management decisions. We develop an integrated integral projection model (IPM

Indexed as

Body SizeBrachyuraModels, BiologicalAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesIntroduced SpeciesPopulation DynamicsEuropean green crabintegral projection modelintegrated population modelinvasive speciessize structurestate–space framework

Identifiers

PMID41217019

DOI10.1111/1365-2656.70176

PMCPMC12775557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.