ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026
Characterization of long-term survivors with liver metastases from uveal melanoma diagnosed between 2005 and 2021.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Characterization of long-term survivors with liver metastases from uveal melanoma diagnosed between 2005 and 2021.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with metastatic uveal melanoma (UM) have a poor prognosis. While long-term survival data in cutaneous melanoma (CM) are promising, such data are lacking in UM and long-term survivors are rare. In cases of metastases, the liver is affected in 90% of cases and is the main determinant of life expectancy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are less effective in UM than in CM. Therefore, liver-directed therapies are of high relevance. We evaluated a large cohort of UM patients (n = 167) who had developed liver metastases between 2005 and 2021. We focused on patients who survived 3 years or more from the initial diagnosis of liver metastases and precisely characterized this cohort with regard to systemic therapies (ST) and liver-specific procedures applied. The last follow-up (FU) date was October 31, 2024. We identified 33 long-term survivors, representing 20% of the total cohort. Most patients had additional extrahepatic metastases (23/33; 70%), while 10 patients had liver metastases only. First-line treatment in the metastatic setting consisted of liver-directed therapies in most of the cases (27/33; 82%). 90% of the patients had received at least one liver-specific procedure at any time point during FU and 85% had received ICI at any time point. Response evaluation revealed a high percentage of patients with disease control (DC) after the first ST (17/27; 63%) or first liver-specific therapy (27/29; 93%), respectively. Notably, all patients with chemosaturation as their first liver-specific procedure achieved DC. Further data are needed on the combination of liver-directed therapy and ST, such as ICI or Tebentafusp.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.