ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2025
Predicting hospice eligibility among dementia patients using language models.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Predicting hospice eligibility among dementia patients using language models.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAlzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) are increasing in prevalence, and access to potential benefits of hospice care remains challenging. Large language models (LLMs), like GPT-4o, applied to electronic health records (EHRs) could support decisions by estimating mortality risk.
methodsWe analyzed patients with ADRD diagnosis from two academic medical centers. GPT-4o was used to estimate 6-month mortality risk from discharge summaries without any retraining or preprocessing. We used Cox regression to assess associations between predictions and time to death.
resultsOf 9872 individuals, 3563 (36%) died within 6 months. GPT-4o predictions stratified risk of death within 6 months (log-rank p < 0.001, area under the curve [AUC] = 0.79); predictions were strongly associated with mortality in Cox regression models (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 31.02 95% confidence interval [CI] 27.44-35.08, p < 0.001) with similar results between sites. DISCUSSION: GPT-4o can stratify mortality risk using routinely generated documentation, potentially facilitating hospice referral decisions, but more prospective work is needed. HIGHLIGHTS: Large language models (LLMs) can estimate 6-month mortality in patients with dementia. GPT-4o estimates of mortality risk from discharge summaries were highly discriminative (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.79). Predictions may support hospice referral decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.