Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41216621›Full record

ArticleEndoscopy international open2025

Prophylactic clipping prevents delayed bleeding after endoscopic mucosal resection of large non-ampullary duodenal lateral spreading lesions.

Gijs Kemper, Christian Gerges, Anton Jonkers, Torsten Beyna, Peter Siersema

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopy international open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gijs KemperGastroenterology & Hepatology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1693-2676
Christian GergesDepartment of Gastroenterology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8271-1102
Anton JonkersGastroenterology & Hepatology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Torsten BeynaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Peter SiersemaGastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and study aims: Non-ampullary duodenal polyps account for a group of rare tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. Although small lesions are relatively easy to remove, resection of larger lesions requires more advanced techniques such as endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). Although this technique is considered safe, the most prevalent complication is delayed bleeding (DB) with considerable incidence rates of up to 26%. In this study, we aimed to assess whether prophylactic clipping (PC) reduces DB rates after EMR of large duodenal non-ampullary lateral spreading lesions. Patients and methods: We retrospectively collected data from consecutive duodenal EMRs of non-ampullary lateral spreading lesions ≥ 15 mm performed between 2019 and 2022 at two medical centers in the Netherlands and Germany. Results: A total of 186 polyps with a mean size of 25 mm were included in this study. Most were tubular adenomas (55%) and contained low-grade dysplasia (84%). PC of the resection site was performed in 84 patients (45%). The overall DB rate was 13% (24/186). DB occurred in three of 84 cases with PC versus 21 of 102 cases without PC (4% versus 21%, Conclusions: PC of the resection site significantly reduced DB after EMR of large non-ampullary duodenal lateral spreading lesions.

Indexed as

Endoscopic resection (ESD, EMRc, ...)Endoscopy Small BowelEndoscopy Upper GI TractNeoplasiaPerformance and complicationsQuality and logistical aspects

Identifiers

PMID41216621
PMCPMC12597080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.