ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2025
Development of a hybrid 2.5D deep learning model for glioma survival prediction using T1-weighted MRI from the CGGA database.
Article in European journal of radiology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- ASLNet: an explainable deep learning framework for glioma grading and survival prediction.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Current glioma survival prediction relies on invasive molecular profiling. To overcome this, a non-invasive deep learning framework using T1-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI (T1CE) was developed to predict overall survival. This framework addresses computational limitations associated with the volumetric analysis while preserving important spatial information. Methods: We designed a hybrid 2.5D convolutional neural network to process multi-slice inputs, including the center slice and its adjacent slices, from 217 patients in the CGGA database. Transfer learning using ResNet and DenseNet architectures were employed to initialize the models. These models were subsequently fine-tuned with the Cox proportional hazards loss function. After the fine-tuning process was completed, the imaging signature was combined with clinical and molecular variables, including IDH and 1p19q status, to build an integrated model. Performance was evaluated via C-index, time-dependent AUC, and Kaplan-Meier analysis in independent training (70 %) and testing (30 %) cohorts. Results: The Combined model achieved superior discrimination, with a training C-index of 0.819 (95 % CI: 0.758-0.880) and a testing C-index of 0.804 (95 % CI: 0.708-0.900). It significantly outperformed the isolated Radiomic, deep learning (2D and 2.5D), and Clinical models (all p < 0.05). Moreover, time-dependent ROC analysis demonstrated consistent model performance over 1-5 years, with AUC values ranging from 0.851 to 0.906. The stratified survival curves clearly revealed distinct prognostic groups (log-rank p < 0.001). Conclusions: The 2.5D multi-source framework provides a clinically feasible, non-invasive tool for preoperative survival prediction, enabling personalized therapeutic strategies for glioma patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.