Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41216598›Full record

ArticleBlood neoplasia2025

Second malignancies among older patients with classical myeloproliferative neoplasms treated with ruxolitinib.

Rong Wang, Jessica M Stempel, Rory M Shallis, Scott F Huntington, Amer M Zeidan, Natalia Neparidze, Mengyang Di, Jan Philipp Bewersdorf, Lourdes Mendez, Xiaomei Ma and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood neoplasia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rong WangDepartment of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT.
Jessica M StempelCancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Rory M ShallisCancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Scott F HuntingtonCancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Amer M ZeidanCancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Natalia NeparidzeCancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Mengyang DiDivision of Hematology and Oncology, University of Washington/Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA.
Jan Philipp BewersdorfCancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Lourdes MendezCancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Xiaomei MaDepartment of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT.
Nikolai A PodoltsevCancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.

Funding

Yale Cancer Center Advanced Training Program for Physician-Scientists (YCC-ATPP)T32CA233414 · NCI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Eric P. Winer · 2019 to 2026
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS N01 PC035136NCI NIH HHS N01 PC035139NCI NIH HHS N02 PC015105NCI NIH HHS T32 CA233414
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and myelofibrosis (MF) are classical Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) associated with an increased risk of development of second primary malignancies (SMs). The reasons for solid and lymphoid SMs are unclear, but a therapy-related effect has been invoked. Although an increased risk of nonmelanoma skin cancers is associated with the use of ruxolitinib (RUX), its influence on the development of other forms of SMs remains controversial. We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis to assess associations between RUX and SMs among older patients diagnosed with MPN from 2012 to 2019 in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare-linked database. We identified 6043 patients (2396 with PV, 2944 with ET, 703 with MF) with a median age of 76 years (interquartile range [IQR], 71-82). After a median follow-up of 3.66 (IQR, 2.25-5.17) and 3.02 years (IQR, 1.84-4.75) for 513 RUX users and 5530 nonusers, respectively, 469 patients developed an SM: 383 solid and 86 lymphoid. In the multivariable proportional subdistribution hazard regression model with death as a competing risk, the risk of developing any SM did not differ by RUX use status (hazard ratio [HR], 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-1.42;

Identifiers

PMID41216598
PMCPMC12597058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.