Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41216594›Full record

ReviewiScience2025

Toward strategies to advance the conductive properties of hydrogel formulations for cardiac tissue engineering.

Wafa Al Shamery, Carmine Gentile

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wafa Al ShamerySchool of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and IT, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia.
Carmine GentileSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and IT, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review article aims to elucidate the role of conductive polymers (CPs) in cardiac bioengineering, focusing on scaffolds and biomaterials required for cardiac tissue engineering. It explores the unique features of CPs that make them well-suited for biomedical applications and explores how these polymers have been optimized to exhibit these properties. Moreover, the review provides insight into the importance of conductive biomaterials and their applications for cardiac repair and regeneration. Furthermore, the review seeks to inform and guide readers in this evolving field, highlighting the significant potential of conductive biomaterials in advancing cardiac tissue engineering. By understanding the capabilities and optimization strategies of CPs, researchers can effectively utilize these materials to develop innovative therapies for myocardial repair and regeneration, ultimately contributing to improved outcomes for patients suffering from heart attacks.

Indexed as

BioengineeringBiomaterialsCardiovascular medicineTissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID41216594
PMCPMC12597012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.