ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025
Monitoring Ototoxicity in Cancer Patients Undergoing Platinum-Based Chemotherapy and Radiation in Saudi Arabia: Challenges and Solutions.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Platinum-based chemotherapy and radiotherapy are cornerstone treatments for many cancers but carry a high risk of ototoxicity, leading to hearing loss, tinnitus, and balance dysfunction. Despite the benefits of monitoring in reducing long-term consequences, global uptake remains poor. This study provides the first national-level insight into ototoxicity monitoring for cancer patients in Saudi Arabia, aiming to identify service gaps and propose solutions to guide healthcare planning. Methods: Twenty-five oncology centers were evaluated. Data were collected via phone interviews with oncologists and audiologists, providing a comprehensive understanding of monitoring in clinical practice. Results: Findings highlight a concerning reality: institutions often fail to support even the most basic elements of ototoxicity monitoring. Practices varied considerably in the absence of formal policies, even within the same institution, depending on audiology service availability and oncologists' referral approaches. Adult referrals were rare, pediatric monitoring was inconsistent, and long-term follow-up was limited. Barriers included inadequate audiological resources, staff shortages, insufficient multidisciplinary coordination, limited audiologists' knowledge, and lack of guidelines. Conclusion: As decision-makers seek reliable national data to guide policies aligned with Vision 2030 health transformation goals, this study proposes policy-based solutions to strengthen ototoxicity monitoring and expand access to hearing rehabilitation services in Saudi Arabia. The study has inspired a collaborative initiative-currently being explored by the author with audiologists and oncologists across health sectors-to promote internal monitoring protocols in capable institutions and lay the groundwork for a future national ototoxicity monitoring program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.