ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2026
Initiation of SGLT2 inhibitors versus mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists as third-line therapy in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a nationwide cohort study.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The effects of combined endurance and resistance exercise training in heart failure: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Pooled it
- The Real-World Use of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction Newly Initiated on Dapagliflozin: An EVOLUTION-HF CEE-BA Study (Results from the Baltic Cohort).Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) guidelines recommend early initiation of four foundational therapies-renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASI), beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. In clinical practice, these drugs are usually introduced sequentially, and optimal sequencing remains uncertain. This study investigated the effectiveness of initiating SGLT2 inhibitors versus MRAs as the third foundational therapy following RASI and beta-blockers. Methods: This was a nationwide non-interventional study in Denmark, July 2020-2023. Patients with HFrEF (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40%) aged ≥45 years on background RASI and beta-blockers were included. An active-comparator new-user design was used to emulate a trial-like comparison. Baseline characteristics were balanced using inverse-probability of treatment weighting based on propensity scores. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular death, heart failure hospitalization, and their composite. Weighted hazard ratios (wHRs) were estimated using proportional hazards regression. Findings: The study included 4185 new MRA users (63% spironolactone, 37% eplerenone) and 2565 new SGLT2 inhibitor users (74% dapagliflozin, 26% empagliflozin). All-cause mortality occurred in 423 MRA users (unweighted rate 6.3 per 100 person-years) and 155 SGLT2 inhibitor users (5.8 per 100 person-years). In weighted analysis comparing SGLT2 inhibitors to MRAs, the wHR was 0.70 (95% CI 0.57-0.86; absolute risk difference -2.1 per 100 person-years, 95% CI -0.9 to -3.2). For the composite secondary outcome, the wHR was 0.83 (95% CI 0.71-0.97); for cardiovascular death, 0.65 (95% CI 0.49-0.87); and for heart failure hospitalization, 0.89 (95% CI 0.74-1.07). Interpretation: Initiating SGLT2 inhibitors as the third foundational therapy after RASI and beta-blockers was associated with significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality compared to MRAs. These findings support the prioritization of SGLT2 inhibitors in treatment sequencing for HFrEF. Funding: This study was supported by the Novo Nordisk Foundation and Karolinska Institutet.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.