Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41216475›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2026

Long-acting nitrate use before and after revascularization to evaluate angina in chronic coronary syndrome: a case-crossover study from SCAAR.

Sacharias von Koch, Tania Sharma, Ramzi Khamis, Tomas Jernberg, Stefan James, Elmir Omerovic, Sammy Zwackman, Johan Sjögren, David Erlinge, Moman A Mohammad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sacharias von KochDepartment of Cardiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Tania SharmaNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ramzi KhamisNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Tomas JernbergDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Stefan JamesDepartment of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, and Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala, Sweden.
Elmir OmerovicDepartment of Cardiology Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sammy ZwackmanDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences and Department of Cardiology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Johan SjögrenDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
David ErlingeDepartment of Cardiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Moman A MohammadDepartment of Cardiology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The ORBITA and ORBITA-2 trials have provided valuable insights into the effects of coronary revascularization in chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). However, uncertainties remain regarding the efficacy of revascularization on symptoms in large real-world populations. To evaluate the efficacy of revascularization, we used dispensed long-acting nitrates as a proxy for the presence of angina. Methods: The Swedish Coronary Angiography and Angioplasty Registry (SCAAR) was used to identify all patients with CCS and at least one stenosis ≥50% undergoing angiography between the 1st of January 2014 and the 16th of January 2020. Four groups were defined based on treatment strategy: coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, complete revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), incomplete revascularization with PCI, and no revascularization. As patients in these treatment arms are inherently different, we employed a case-crossover design where each patient served as their own control with data collected during two periods: 1 year before up until angiography and 1-2 years after. This study design inherently controls for time-invariant confounding. The primary outcome was the use of long-acting nitrates defined as a dispensed prescription during the studied periods. Conditional Poisson regression was used to analyse the data. Findings: For this study, 15,955 patients were eligible. CABG, complete revascularization with PCI, and incomplete revascularization with PCI were associated with a decrease in dispensed prescriptions of long-acting nitrates (from 989/2218 [30.8%] to 156/3207 [4.9%]; risk-ratio (RR): 0.16 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.13-0.19]), (from 1676/7525 [22.3%] to 966/7525 [12.8%]; RR: 0.58 [95% CI: 0.53-0.62]), and (from 601/2180 [27.6%] to 495/2180 [22.7%]; RR: 0.82 [95% CI: 0.73-0.93]), respectively. No difference was observed for no revascularization (from 864/3043 [28.4%] to 856/3043 [28.1%]; RR: 0.99 [95% CI: 0.90-1.09]). Interpretation: Revascularization reduces the use of long-acting nitrates in patients with CCS, suggesting angina symptom improvement. CABG appears to provide a more significant effect than PCI, with complete PCI demonstrating greater effectiveness than incomplete revascularization. Funding: This work was supported by The Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation, ALF, Skane University Hospital funds, the Crafoord Foundation and the Swedish Medical Association.

Indexed as

AnginaChronic coronary syndromeCoronary artery bypass graft surgeryLong-acting nitratesPercutaneous coronary intervention

Identifiers

PMID41216475
PMCPMC12596951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.